36 reviews (showing 1–20)

Upkeep
3.4
Shot variety/design
3.3
Tee areas
3.0
Signage/wayfinding
2.1
Amenities
2.4
Scenery/views
3.0
beanpeel

@beanpeel

15

Simple holes, Udisc is a must for course layout. Good for practice!

cstapko

@cstapko

9

The new tee signs are awesome πŸ‘Œ

trexrex

@trexrex

2

I love the shot shapes some of these tees make you take but if you miss the fairway good luck. Was on the course for 1.5 hours and only got through 6 holes. I still walked away with one fewer disc than I started with.

mwlundgren

@mwlundgren

2

Great variety of shots. Arrows to the next tee are all fallen off. Second half doesn't have tee pads, just signs. Overall a great neighborhood course though.

tappers74

@tappers74

7

Layout is confusing, grass is cut

mercatorcooper

@mercatorcooper

11

Lots of possibility, but without the app for directions, the course is unplayable.

After playing 18 White
suptgoat

@suptgoat

10

I don’t wanna be too harsh on the course cause it is 18 holes and I went in the winter when the course looks great looking in the summer, but the back nine is lazy and the tees on the back nine are just a wood post

1
brandon913

@brandon913

No signs, Poor layout. Could be a nice course.

2
bak3dhippy31

@bak3dhippy31

26

Needs tee pads from hole 9 thru 17. Mark each tee and pin basket better. Overall decent course if labeled and tee pads were better.

greghaag2

@greghaag2

110

Could be perfect

After playing 18 White
jgruseck

@jgruseck

13

Love to play this courses but hard to find a holes in each area so next time it need to get more clear path to find the holes.

After playing 18 White
maximumdistance

@maximumdistance

30

Fairly simple par 3 course, nothing too exciting. Pretty decent upkeep but fairways are narrow so it can be difficult finding discs even on good shots. Overall fun and simple course, good for beginners.

After playing 18 Red
shiftywolfe

@shiftywolfe

The coarse has very bad fairway upkeep. All the tees are not maped out unless you use an online service which is ok but still should be there. The back 9 are just a simple zig zag par 3 after part 3 until hole 17

1
asg201

@asg201

If you loose your disc in the waist high grass good luck

1
noobnoob

@noobnoob

Gets a little goofy in the middle holes, short, tight & mostly wide open. Real perrty with the trees bloomin.

1
joelwarren

@joelwarren

10

What a mess. Massively overgrown. I left midway through the third hole to go to Crooked Creek.

After playing 18 White
1
og19011

@og19011

70

It's a course with two personalities. What I imagine is the original 9 is mostly creatively designed. There are a couple great shots that challenge your game. I love that 3rd hole The tees are small and I can't figure why they wouldn't at least paint tee numbers on the posts. It's also on beatiful wetland that was full of singing birds. The new 9 is a whole different story. They are pitch and putt holes with no real obstacles and empty brush cleared land. There are grass tees here.

allstar33

@allstar33

Grass needs mowed into wider fairways at least. The long downhill hole is almost unthrowable due to high grass in any landing zone. Many of the greens have thick briars and brush within the first circle which is tough to handle. On positive notes, the baskets and tees are much better than I expected. And there are unique shot ideas for a fairly open area.

1
jperd240

@jperd240

17

The back 9 on this course is possibly the worst and laziest layout I've ever seen which sucks because when the front is cut and groomed it's awesome

ericjageman

@ericjageman

101

The front 9 is not too bad when the grass is cut. Back 9 is a pitch & putt with no obstacles. Good to play if you’re a local one or two times a year but otherwise don’t drive out of your way.