124 reviews (showing 1–20)

Upkeep
3.8
Shot variety/design
4.1
Tee areas
2.3
Signage/wayfinding
3.2
Amenities
2.9
Scenery/views
4.1
vertseven

@vertseven

44

Coming from Florida, the “elevation” was lots of fun. The back 9 is more of what I’m used to. Wooded and technical. The GPS locations are off a bit. I’m clearly not making 66’+ puts on every basket. 😂

After playing Full 18
thecolebarnhart

@thecolebarnhart

52

Would be a 4.5 to 5 if it had concrete tees. Shorter shots with fun elevation change and shot variety.

After playing Full 18
sturmans

@sturmans

122

This is my home course, league course, and this matters. Thank you everyone for your feedback. I will push my continued efforts forth to make the Udisc Smart Layout precise. I want teepads and alternate pins. I will start organizing a push. This will take everyone. It will take funding and the correct avenues. Baird is due this. Thank you.

7
bogester

@bogester

145

Tee pads and signage could use a bit of work. Solid course otherwise

After playing Full 18
squish79

@squish79

57

Definitely needs concrete tee pads and better signage than just what # hole it is.. Udisc app is also inaccurate... other than that it was a nice course full of exercises.. especially for the legs

rustscientist

@rustscientist

127

A fantastic course.

patrickrad

@patrickrad

49

Cool course, great use of elevation. Nice variety of shots, sometimes takes a second to get bearing and head for next tee box.

After playing Full 18
1
someone

@someone

124

Took a fun course and turned it in to a guardian tree, lucky gap hitting pile of poo. Let's hope it gets redesigned by a competent designer next time.

2
llykoz

@llykoz

53

A fun, par 3 course with a lot of shot variety. The tee pads are an absolute travesty and a rolled ankle waiting to happen, but - overall - it's a good course.

1
lucasjames2000

@lucasjames2000

54

I enjoy the new layout. Shorter and more technical course than before. Some U disc hole distances are off. Hole 10 is at least 260 ft. Hole 2 is over 300 ft.

After playing Full 18
1
dggnm97

@dggnm97

55

This is a great course that is a staple in the disc golf community in GB. The redesign has elements that could make the course better than what it was, but it seems that efforts have more or less stalled out. Concrete tee pads that were rumored to be put in in the summer of 23’ are no existent leaving weird gravel craters to throw out of. Some holes feel like they have not been fully cut and trimmed. Overall its a good course, just needs a couple of amenities upgrades to really shine.

connoruity

@connoruity

78

Up and down the hill way to much Need better signage

After playing Full 18
davepoff

@davepoff

71

Fun course with lots of elevation changes. I would have scored it higher but the lack of tee boxes and signage issues drag its score down.

ktulu1326

@ktulu1326

62

Too wide open

starshreck

@starshreck

61

Udisc for 11&12 not accurate. Tee pads are rough. Good place to practice ~200ft standstills. New layout much better.

wallice

@wallice

95

No tee pads, garbage cans and poor signage.

After playing Full 18
smither76

@smither76

43

Grass is cut well. No tee pads it’s all just patches of dirt that you assume are the tee boxes. Overall not terrible but not great

After playing Full 18
toolegit2quit

@toolegit2quit

67

Great disc golf course, been disc golfing here for 22 years. Never fails to impress me how well maintained it is.

stabenau

@stabenau

47

Needs the course map put back out for new players and needs better teepads. I've seen and also slipped on the gravel teepads. Fun new layout with more wooded holes.

ttolma

@ttolma

56

Incredible work on the redesign! If I could give 6 stars I would

After playing Full 18