Tri-C

@bmwilloughby89

87

I really wanted to give a good rating but it gets tiring constantly throwing bombs to try to get a par. It's a repetitive back and forth across large grassy areas.

@jamorose5

41

Overall, not bad. If you live close, it’s worth playing. Grass is always cut. Great place to work on accuracy and upshot’s. Nike park is right next door as well offering more technical, shorter shots. Would highly recommend as a place to work on your game.

@joelgsoccer

44

If you want to do field work and call it a round, this place is good for that. No tees, just grass or rooty dirt.

@alexdoubek18

29

Bomber open course. Grass tee areas. Long awkward walk from 18th hole to parking area by hole 1. Overall a fun course especially if you are looking to improve your distance.

@iansenz18

26

Grass needs cut, signage is hard to follow for first time playing. Fun long course nonetheless.

@isaiahscastro

39

Worst course ever played

@ncraft150

74

If the college took a little pride and spent a little money this could be a nice open long course. I played it the first year I played and it hasn't changed in 7 or 8 years. Mach 2 baskets are ok and in good shape. No signage and no tee pads.

@goonermjl

58

It a long open course without tee pads. If your close it provides great field work.

@verliererkolben

40

Nothing really but long bombs, and then a really disappointing short hole 18 after you throw your arm out lol.

@mattmullen

49

Adding tee pads, in general, with benches and creating amateur "short" tees for players developing their power would be a huge improvement to this course. Creating an additional layout/pin locations on some of the holes, and maybe even some mandos, would improve the lack of shot variety too. Implementing clear signage at the tee box and at the basket (ie. "Next tee pad ->") would be great for the out-of-towners. Udisc is a cheap solution to the signage but this course would be utilized way more if some or all of these changes were made.

@sprouser

32

Overall pretty fun, but some small tweaks to layout/design could help it a lot.

@treeslxyr

91

Pars suck, teepads don’t exist for the ridiculous length of the holes. Layout isn’t good. Boring to play.

@basecreek47

73

Course is very long and some of the tee pads are very far away. Pretty open, but some obstacles on most holes. Overall not a bad course, but not great. Played at 6:00pn. I was the only disc golfer which was cool. Bonus points for that.

@paullovestacos

25

It’s a bomber with very long par 3s throughout. Needs tee pads badly.

@mcfeever

23

A bomber. Good for learning your drivers and working on long-distance form in wind. Some shot shaping needed, but mostly a heave on every shot.

@islandcaveman

31

Great course for beginners if you want to practice throwing far, but for any advance players it might be too easy. Great way to practice. There is visitor parking in lot C & D. Overall a nice course but I would have add nice tees at each start.

@jayyyeah

35

Needs better signs and maybe flags for the baskets

@joeinlakewood

30

Clearly marked. Great parking. Nice long course. Not technically challenging.

@daveomster

48

Very long and open. Great practice for driving. Nicely manicured fairways. It’s perfect for what it is, but not too much variation from hole to hole.

@baseball3

60

Solid bomber course that works well for practicing any shot you'd like