@mcclary
A couple of soggy spots in the fw, some very thick spots off the fairway. Gold layout was an excellent challenge. Would recommend.

@heibelm
Decent course, started playing the longs but ended up seeing how long and kind of boring the holes were so switched to orange layout half way. Orange layout has some nice holes but very repetitive. Definitely has room for improvement, but not a bad course for the area.
@skidtank
Some holes are just entirely too long l.

@feelinlucky7
Garbage course, no parking, overgrown grass, trash, untouched rough, homeless sleeping in cars around course, meth cook came from house on corner after hole 9 gold, to question my son and I and he was acting really paranoid assuming we knew something about the house he came from, just weird and uncomfortable. Overall design of layout is bad with back tracking, long walks between holes and overall poor use of space. Really sad because the course and park have great potential, but it seems like the area brings it down a lot. No one should rate this course above a 3 in the condition it is in save yourself the trip I certainly wish I did.

@jadonmain
Gold layout is honestly pretty awesome, great variety and mix of par 3 and par4s, with one 900’ long par 5. Lots of really great holes. However the course could definitely use some love, it seems fairly neglected and not well manicured, which I’d only imagine gets worse later in the spring. Signage needs an update, the parking situation really sucks (there basically is none) and a couple of the teepads were on the black asphalt road and very slick in the rain.

@throwsiba
Solid park style course

@bgefour
Picked up a lot of trash along the course. Number 12 had cars parked and blocking the fairway due to the dog park.

@averagenebo
Good course. Some of the tee signs missing. Good experience though.

@racertempo
Night and day compared to Stone. Really enjoyed the orange. You can tell so much work has been put in here.
@ljwobker
Combo of open and woods, a little tall grass but no big deal. UDisc maps are pretty good, use them as many tees and baskets serve two layouts.

@discgolfcraig
The course weaves through multiple disconnected sections of the park, requiring frequent road crossings, throws alongside roads, and constant awareness of cars, creating a scattered but intentional layout. • Not overly difficult overall, which favors bigger arms, though placement matters on several holes, especially #4, #5, #11, and #15, where landing on the wrong side of the fairway creates awkward or blocked approaches. • The course does ultimately loop back cleanly to the first tee, and despite the back-and-forth feel, there is a method to the routing. • A recurring design theme places baskets behind large trees or tree lines on most holes, which works at times but becomes repetitive over the course of the round. • Standout holes include #3 (most scenic), #6 (island green and the most replayed hole), and #7, while the longest holes (#5 and #8) reward smart placement over pure distance. • Navigation is the biggest issue, with overlapping Gold and original layouts, minimal directional signage, blind throws, thick rough, and multiple points where a map or app is required to avoid skipped holes or misplayed fairways.
@dpmjr2021
I've been playing this course for years and it used to be much better but the maintenance is below average. Walking path from 6 to 7 has overgrown vegetation. Teepad of #13 being taken over by vegetation. Narrow fairways are even more narrow since vegetation hasn't been trimmed. Mowing of entire course seems to be done with less frequency.

@jedwavis
Great course! Test of length and technical ability. Could use better signs but not hard to follow with UDisc.