114 reviews (showing 1–20)

Upkeep
3.8
Shot variety/design
3.0
Tee areas
3.7
Signage/wayfinding
3.2
Amenities
3.5
Scenery/views
3.3
ryanmessenger

@ryanmessenger

242

This course is fun, but hole 5 may be the worst hole I've ever played. Hole 9 tee and basket locations on the Udisc layout are not accurate

2
nervturf

@nervturf

43

Wouldn’t recommend to anyone’s normal rotation. Pretty embarrassing for Centerville! See Miamisburg (Sycamore). This place was closed down for renovations as well and is still a goat ranch!

After playing Front 9
revjrod

@revjrod

35

This course is a bit of a mixed bag. Supposedly there was a “redesign,” but the only difference I noticed was hole 9/18. Several tee pads are missing signs and distances appear wrong so using uDisc is essential. Hole 5 needs some trimming but it is still playable. While not long, the course does require the player to use multiple shot shapes. Not as bad as some reviewers say, but nothing special either.

After playing Main
jscincy1

@jscincy1

50

Redesign by City of Centerville Government has left the course dangerous. Use caution when playing #8/#17

dsjoman

@dsjoman

81

I think this course is underrated fun course play 1 and 10 same timeakes for fun round without playing thru twice

kodysanders

@kodysanders

48

This course is definitely not what it used to be. Pin 5 is effectively unplayable. 9 and 18’s pin wasn’t thought out. Kind of disappointed in how the course was updated.

After playing Main
clark2bbc

@clark2bbc

48

Somehow they only made a few changes during the redesigned and ruined the course. Mainly 9/18

irbium1

@irbium1

85

Should be a 9-hole course. Hole 5/14 needs a redesign. Tees for 9/18 are right next to basket 17. Don't go by Udisc. Not a hard course. I get the feeling a better layout could be done. The baskets aren't the best but they will do. Overall decent 9-hole park course.

wolfpacdar

@wolfpacdar

42

21 April 2025 update: the course should re-open early June, according to the park development administrator.

1
lorenb

@lorenb

791

The 2025 revamp has a subtitle, the great disappointment. They hurt the course and introduced safety concerns by the redesign. It’s a pity because the course could be a lot of fun.

After playing Fast Round
4
stevo4756

@stevo4756

38

No way is this a 5 star course. A decent 3.5 star seems fair. Rated higher to offset those boneheads who left half a star because it's under construction and the baskets are pulled!

1
bubbletrousers

@bubbletrousers

75

9 baskets and 18 teepads. Shots are mostly fair to a player at any level.

After playing Main
savior99

@savior99

51

Nothing corrected after during park remodel. Hole 5 is still terrible, and 9/18 is a joke. Throwing at the road and picnic tables

ohioredeyes

@ohioredeyes

54

Hole 5 needs some trees cut down

1
generalgrevence

@generalgrevence

71

Well maintained course albeit not the most exciting course around. Doing the same baskets for the back nine is not ideal but the alternate tee areas make it alright. Update: The changes in 2025 leave a lot to be desired. Wish the city would have allowed for some real improvements to the course with the park upgrades.

1
adamsmithtmp

@adamsmithtmp

56

Holes 5 and 14 are worse than they’ve been in the last 5 years. No line to the basket. Just throw over the trees and hope. The new 9 and 18 are ok, but the old ones were much more interesting. Old 9 and 18 would still fit almost exactly as they used to be.

After playing Main
1
dhilt72

@dhilt72

36

Very fun. A bit muddy at the moment but fun.

After playing Main
lefty4

@lefty4

81

Hole 9/18 now unsafe for others around. Trees around pond need cutting.

After playing Main
snazzypajamas

@snazzypajamas

68

9 baskets. 2 pads but 2 different throws.

conley39

@conley39

162

Fun course. Just enough variety. Well kept. Watch out for non-disc golfers.