@elbows12
Review after Midwest Amsters 5/26/25: Really good mix of true golf shots and park golf, requires everything from hyzers, to FH, to anny shots. Even playing shorts a couple actual drives needed vs Mids & fairways only. Very well maintained fairways and tee boxes. Can tell the course is well cared for, even in the woods. Not much in the way of pointing to next holes if not a local, but after 2/3 rounds could probably figure it out if you don’t have UDisc. No facilities as far as I saw as far as bathrooms on course, but the I-Fling Store up the hill/around the corner had one if needed. Would give it 4.25 if I could vs a flat 4.
@danerdman6
Awsome, suuuuuuper hott!!
@rgmartin
Underrated course. Baskets are brand new. So much fun. Highly recommended. Signage could be better but that honestly is the only critique. Use UDisc for finding your way.
@stuartsch
This course is rather plain. Not mudmch shot variety. Can tell that it is well cared for. New pads. Not finished with all the signage. New holes across the road need some attention for erosion control.
@zjr817
We've thrown this course a few times before and they have since updated the layout. Unfortunately, some pins (specifically on the tree holes) were really hard to spot even when walking halfway down the fairway. The baskets need more visibility markers or to just be painted not grey. Some of the updated holes need updated pars and flight paths because the distance measured was not accurate to a fair, viable flight path (hole 12 flight path wants you to go 330+ feet straight through thick trees for a par 3 when really the hole is now a LONG dogleg right). Overall, we like the redesign and new challenges but felt there needed to be more info updates.
@cometz2000
Could have potential but the current course designer is getting a little over zealous.
@borser1
Really cool and well designed course. Loved the front 9. The back 9 was wooded and more technical which was fun but basket layout seemed too deep in the woods at times. Signage and wayfinding was confusing for some holes. Really good shot variety throughout the course. Would play again for sure
@iadspeed6
I'm not a big fan of the new pin locations on some of the holes. I like the idea of making it a little harder, but it's hard to see the birdie line. The new locations greens in the woods need to be cleared out more too.
@rossbeyer1
Signage need repair and basket on hole one is missing. It could also use better signs for navigating to the next tee. Otherwise the course has a ton of potential. I played the longs and found the variety of shots to be really fun. The tee pads were awesome and the fairways were well maintained.
@brotonthompson
Great course with fun lines throughout. They call it beauty and the beast for a reason!!
@clinton
Tee boxes and tee signs are being fixed. Lot of course maintenance needs. No benches, no garbage cans. Chainstar baskets. Great course layout. Longs are super challenging. Secondary basket locations would be great.
@clairalive
I love the variety & the am tees! New tee placement & silage is all correct now!
@backhandbrotha
Bring some bug spray and extra socks but other than that enjoy a great course with variety of sweet shots !
@dauntlessdote
Difficult course, definitely need to be accurate with your drives on every hole. Some tee pads need upkeep, and more directions through the wooded half. But, very fun and technical course.
@midknight
Good variety of shots, multiple tees, fun course. Stay out of the beans!
@aaronmayes
Great par 3 course! It's well-maintained, and you're not that likely to lose discs unless you really rip it into the rough. The front half is mostly open for attacking with a few tightly wooded holes. On the back it gets more technical. You're dealing with tunnel shots for 75% of the holes, as well as some elevation changes.