31 reviews (showing 1–20)

Upkeep
3.9
Shot variety/design
3.8
Tee areas
3.5
Signage/wayfinding
3.4
Amenities
3.3
Scenery/views
4.2
hyoomac

@hyoomac

507

Current (2025) nine hole layout hole is spread around the open sections of the park. Excellent baskets and paver tees. Will be very beginner-friendly when the red tees are installed. Design does its best to use elevation changes and wooded borders, but every hole is just straight and open. Lots of extra walking to connect the existing holes. Looking forward to the wooded back nine in 2026. Detailed review at Discgolfcoursereview.com

2
zigs2114

@zigs2114

43

I really enjoyed this course. It has some great scenery and fun holes. Currently a WIP with tee pads still going in and tee signs going up but has potential to be one of the better courses in SE Pa.

1
bigdaddy9

@bigdaddy9

133

The back nine here has a lot of potential… The changes made to the back from a year ago, were great. Once the tee pads on the back are done and the signs updated with new hole numbers this would be a 4. One piece of advice. The long walk to 4 only to make the walk again to 5 seems a bit much. If you could find space for one more hole in the woods, you could go straight to 5 and then use the basket of 4 to be 18’s basket. Further throw down hill and could still use the circle if you wanted to.

1
noktaroba

@noktaroba

34

Great potential as more work gets done on the course. Still currently a little rough in areas but is mostly clean. A few holes near parking could be a little tricky to play with park attendees.

1
mitchellgill17

@mitchellgill17

87

Very much looking forward to the back 9. The 9 they have is GREAT!! But the walk between holes is a little funky, I hoe they fix that

1
mkosar

@mkosar

40

Was a little muddy, but such a fun course! Had to throw from the sides of a couple of the later teepads

parkplace

@parkplace

83

Back 9 is the redeeming quality of the course but could use some work like cutting down a small tree here and there and removing some thorny brush. Front 9 is a bit lackluster, could be redone completely. There’s so much space to work with, there’s a lot of potential. Honestly don’t hate the course as is but there’s much room for improvement. Currently seems like a winter only course but with some work, could be a year round course. Holes 2 and 3 could be combined. Hole 4 seems like a good spot for hole 18 tbh. Holes 6 and 7 could use some flags to mark out the hazards. Hole 8 mando is kinda dumb, would be better as an island. I know it’s still not a finished product but would love to see it live up to its full potential

fireflarf

@fireflarf

55

Pretty good course, a lot of shot variety, it's not stunning, but it doesn't need to be. Tees on the Front 9 are quite good, but are pretty lacking in the back half. I also can imagine that this course is quite a bear to navigate in the summer.

tunatuan

@tunatuan

26

Great course, long walks, took about 3 hours to play the whole course.

tdibby

@tdibby

24

Back 9 is really good, the front half needs some work. A lot of wide open shots that kind of become repetitive.

jacksonkulp12

@jacksonkulp12

30

I think it’s a great local course! Good for all skill levels, they have a unique shot shape design for most holes after 3, good use of hazards to add difficulty. Truthfully, there’s nothing special about it that would draw me away from Kerr or ABN or even like Kenilworth… but sometimes that itself is the draw

curly453

@curly453

68

Can see a lot of work has been done and when finished the course will no doubt be a 4 just from the back nine.

itsrudy

@itsrudy

85

The front half of this course are more typical holes but #5-9 are pretty good and different. Beginner shot shapes. Bookended by downhills (1/9) rest are flat or moderately uphill. #5 and 9 are my faves. Despite that, many holes have right edged with nasty brush you can easily loose discs in, so if griplock is your problem this course is a bad fit.

dozer83s

@dozer83s

84

Nice little course. Only did the front 9.

1
rolsav

@rolsav

32

Markers to next tee are needed (or just use UDisc)

1
birdman1709

@birdman1709

19

Front nine is good and playable

jleslie

@jleslie

94

The potential is there, but very overgrown and no tee pads on several holes on the back 9. Signage and basket numbers don’t match up.

ajbiii

@ajbiii

41

The long nine in the front is, most likely I think we all hope, the set up for the long nine behind it. If 18 can be set up without playing shorts/longs, this will be another Chester County PDGA worthy courses. Matty P is a legend.

padre146684

@padre146684

20

Extremely muddy and slippery. Some holes there's no chance for a good drive, overgrown.

1
cshov12

@cshov12

29

This course is just not it. Bulldoze it and put the baskets somewhere else. Back 9 is a swamp, tee signs are all wrong, plenty of spots to lose a disc without being able to retrieve them. Just not fun to play at all