7 reviews

Upkeep
2.7
Shot variety/design
3.7
Tee areas
3.1
Signage/wayfinding
2.3
Amenities
2.7
Scenery/views
3.8
julien42

@julien42

1

Tous les panneaux sont à revoir. Illisible, pas juste, manque de panier. Un peu déçu.

After playing Permanent
jonasd29

@jonasd29

9

We had lot of fun playing the course! Great hole design and variety. Sadly more than half of the signs were missing, but with the app navigation was fine. Most tee locations were good. Excellent course, which just needs a little bit of love.

variancebiatch

@variancebiatch

44

Cool and challenging low ceiling shots. Course needs some upkeep though. A few teepads are full of (duck/dog) shit and most of them very slippery. Course is probably unplayable if there is good weather because of all the people. Recommend early morning round with not the best weather 😉

After playing Permanent
hann3s

@hann3s

30

Nice teepads and some nicely designed holes, unfortunately the whole parcours is very bad situated in my opinion. This parc was crowded, had to skip some holes; you often have to be careful not to hit cars; it‘s pretty wide spread around the river; the signs were often not exististing; some of the baskets were very rusted; the hole numbers were off of UDisc as well as some of the teepad positions, one basket was completely missing, no course overview.

flickapproach

@flickapproach

139

Some very cool lines often designed in very unsafe ways at the beginning and end of course. Holes near the river are scenic and very fun. UDisc and tee signs often disagree — not a beginner course.

After playing Permanent
runerois

@runerois

Chemin avec des potentiels! besoin de mise à jour des panneaux par rapport à Udisck, et il est alors sage de jouer tôt dans la journée puisque le parcours est intégré dans un parc populaire

thomas314

@thomas314

Technical course, but too many people to play the holes with power. According to a local one should play in the morning. Tee signs do not reflect what's in Udisc. Watch out for dog shit.