Monroe Township Community Park
22 reviews (showing 1–20)
@fathalpert
Course layout is not safe for pedestrians. Fortunately there was only one walker when I played. Many shots force you to throw blindly toward walking paths or park benches. I don’t mind walking paths but if you can’t see them you don’t know if anyone’s coming.
@calebh27
Doesn’t have tee pads but the 9 hole layout gives you some variety and several big bombing throws. Fun course to practice distance driving on.
@cpaige0613
Nice course, great challenge if you want to work on distance, or Anhyzer/Hyzer
@td2005
Great use of the community park’s space. No tee pads - but helpful signs on baking sheets.
@wjbechtel
Tee pads would help greatly. As would signs for the extra three holes. Extremely long holes.
@tbdrummer67
Good course with mostly open holes. Nice walk, but long. Beware the 948 foot par 7 hole 4! This was set up as 6 holes, but apparently they've added 3 more, playing existing tees to different holes: play tee 1 to basket 2, tee 2 to basket 4 (making 4 the same but longer), and tee 4 to hole 9. I would play the last 3 differently: tee 1 to basket 3, tee 4 back to basket 2, then tee 3 to basket 6.
@adamklapper
Awful course. You can tell they only had the budget for six baskets and we’re trying to compensate by making every hole super long. Can see basket on maybe 2 of the 6 holes? Awful length which they clearly used to try to make up for the fact that the course has an awful design. Each hole is wide open and each throw on the course is the exact same. Wide open so wind has a massive effect. Tried to use mandatory layouts to make holes more difficult but it just made each hole more boring.
@jgeiman
Great course considering it was an Eagle Scout project on a budget. But skip it. For real.
@fallofshadows
No tee pads, and the signs are confusing. UDisc doesn’t match what’s on the signs, although I’d say the pars on UDisc are more accurate to how the course plays. OB lines are not clearly distinguished. Also, in the space where they put 6 holes, they could have easily build 9. I’m glad I played a new course today, but I won’t likely be back.
@willsvitko
Mostly long open holes, might be busy with baseball or soccer games
@mgrosskettler
Holes way too long! Definitely need to break up a few and you’d have more baskets
@hyoomac
Baskets in a field, with the added danger of hitting other park users. The six holes are way too long for newbies, and too wide open for experienced players to play “golf” shots (Throw straight as far as you can. Repeat.). When considering the element of danger to other park users, you really have to limit the times you can play - to when there aren’t walkers, or people using the soccer or baseball fields. Thow with caution.
@jasmittyy
Play by the OB on each holes card. Definitely makes the round better, instead of having a massive open field every hole. Teeing off on 3 is a blind shot over the walking path, be careful of walkers. Hole 5 is also blind between 2 baseball fields. Hole 6 is playing directly towards the pavilion.
@chasej21
Nice long hard shots. Great to develop your forehand on. Definitely challenging. The paths could be smoother for scooters/bikes for the kids.
@reedlax2
Pretty park. No tee pads and poor maps. Some very very long holes, very open with little obstacles. Still fun.
@sbeaver44
Did the best they could with the space. Sometimes the holes are a little confusing.
@don123
6 holes, one really long hole
@kenobisan
A challenging course that will discourage beginners or anyone who doesn't excel at long throws. I think 1, 2 and 6 have accurate pars. 4 is a monster and should be a par 6 or split into two holes. 5 is a very challenging par 4 and I think it should be bumped to a par 5 because of the ridiculous line you have to make in the beginning which is basically through a sporadic grove of trees.
@luck18
No pads to drive off. Holes are challenging. This was our first time here.