148 reviews (showing 1–20)

Upkeep
4.3
Shot variety/design
4.1
Tee areas
4.0
Signage/wayfinding
2.8
Amenities
3.3
Scenery/views
4.1
justinsteiner

@justinsteiner

49

Underrated course.

borser1

@borser1

153

Really well designed course especially for a park style course. With some improved signage and wayfinding it would be even better. Decent mix of open and technical holes with decent tee pads and baskets. No signs at tee boxes and holes are sometimes pretty far apart. As with most park courses it throws over and across walking paths and trails at times but does steer clear of picnic and playground areas. Well designed course given the space I had fun playing it

After playing Standard 18 Hole
charlesrayburn

@charlesrayburn

96

Decent park style course with a couple of really questionable holes and mandos. No signage and multiple long walks take off an entire point.

After playing Standard 18 Hole
kimballs

@kimballs

57

Decent park style course. Nothing fancy, but it works. Some pretty scenery near the river. Long walk to 8. Even longer walk to back 9. Almost plays like two separate tracks.

After playing Standard 18 Hole
joeco68

@joeco68

96

Fun course with great use of the land and obstacles.

beeballca

@beeballca

105

It was completely boring bomb holes at the front and then the back got fun and entertaining ( technical ) overall good course wouldn’t plan a trip back to it but good

genekouba

@genekouba

616

Pay close attention to location of basket 11, #17 can fool you. Park is clean. No homeless campers, no litter, and toilets were clean.

hawgdriver

@hawgdriver

55

Great park course

martti

@martti

115

Fun little park course, not too hard!

After playing Standard 18 Hole
isaachelwig

@isaachelwig

39

Seems like a newer front 9 that is really fun open holes with a back nine that is in the woods short and could use some love.

After playing Standard 18 Hole
franskuop

@franskuop

44

With UDisc it is easy to navigate

After playing Standard 18 Hole
rudibega

@rudibega

57

The course is what you get. It’s not great. The front 9 has nearly no creativity. The back nine is ok. Not enough to justify a travel plan to the course, but if it’s what you got, get it.

1
jordangrussling

@jordangrussling

41

Awesome course, great mix of open and wooded golf. Nice views of the river and trees

bgietzen16

@bgietzen16

38

Back nine better than the front nine. Had a little walk from front nine to back nine.

After playing Standard 18 Hole
phyco8

@phyco8

74

Back 9 is awesome. Front 9 is generic. -Michigan disc golfer

After playing Standard 18 Hole
georgeclark

@georgeclark

76

Tee pads are slick. Will be back to ace run then back 9

After playing Standard 18 Hole
noahchris614

@noahchris614

36

Good park course, no signage and not much variety

coling26

@coling26

84

Back 9 gets 5 stars! Great woods golf with interesting lines, new baskets, and nice variety of shot shapes. Front 9 gets 3 stars. Mostly open park golf, a few holes are gems but older baskets and an irritating walk between 7 and 8.

After playing Back 9
1
markr305

@markr305

128

This course needs signs in a bad way!

After playing Standard 18 Hole
jongardner

@jongardner

35

Best course in the area! Front 9 has longer more open shots, and back 9 is shorter and more technical. Signage would be nice but this is a solid 18 holes of golf!