Kutter Park
41 reviews (showing 1–20)
@coinupbtc
One bridge, many ditches, back 9 better than front 9 Tight quarter with creek, wear boots
@kfree35
2.25 ⭐️ First of all, I do see the vision. The design seems alright, mix of park holes, long holes, and shorter woods holes that play around and across a creek. The issue is all of the woods and creek areas are way overgrown and some have nonexistent lines, including throwing over the next teepad a few times. Unfortunately it seems that not enough people play here or do maintenance on the woods holes to keep it in a good state. Do yourself a favor and go down the road to Gordon Moore instead.
@rkaroliinaward
18 Fairway course for intermediate and advanced players. The course has vast variety of fairways. Starting half is mainly forest fairways. Fairway 7 follows the little creeks snake bends. Fairways 8- 18 rise up to the field meadows, even though Fairway 9, 10, 11 and 14 cross over the creek valley. Great amenities considering the park area, there's 2 main picnic areas with a playgrounds for children. Next to the baseball fields there's a public toilet. Trash can nicely located throughout the course.
@alexhallumsdisc
Fun 18 hole course. Older innova baskets & fun shot shapes to throw. Nice mix of distances and great use of elevation. Unfortunately the tee-pads are home-made & don’t work very well. With the addition of proper concrete tee-pads & legitimate signage, this course could be a lot better. Overall, worth a trip if you’re looking for something new.
@premming
With a little love and tee pads this could be a nice course. There are quite a few fun shots. Needs play more than anything.
@chewtobacca
This course is absolutely garbage and not scored correctly per PDGA rules
@bkroll
Back 9 needs bridges over creek, or a rearrangement. Hole 4/5 need to be redesigned, landing zone of 4 is tee of 5, we shouldn’t be shooting into another tee box. 7 needs to be redesigned, or a mando meeds to be put in. Mats and teeboxes need some love.
@noahfree
This course is pretty bad; it really has all the negative qualities you don’t want—high lost disc potential, dangerous walks between and in the middle of holes (traversing creeks and drainage ditches), very few actually fun shots, overlapping and weird-angled holes, several very difficult holes with bad scoring separation…
@jttef7
Tough for beginners. Lots of fun though. Plenty of interesting shot shapes. Poorly maintained
@jeffrogo
Not very cart friendly. Creek is treacherous (deep and steep) and in play for most holes. Course has some potential but needs maintenance.
@vanessastone
Not for beginners at all!! We spent more time in the creeks and trees than on the course. If this had been my first time ever, I would never play again. Definitely for people who can throw between trees.
@danh1231
A lot of shot require crossing a creek at specific areas that ended up with alot of additional walking the creak also has heavy over growth so any disc in that area is very hard to find. Tee pads are very rough as well
@heiney99
Fun course, great holes! Be prepared to cross a creek a few times on the back nine.
@drink1water
Poorly maintained, tee boxes are bad and getting worse. The brush and tall grass make it hard to find most throws.
@early8
Not playable, holes 4 and 7 are not well maintained. As a beginner the creek trenches will eat your discs.
@kphanner
Save your time, don’t stop here. Overall, not a great course. 1/3 of the holes are poke and hope. Some tee shots have no natural gaps to hit. Tee boxes are inconsistent with the rubber and gravel. A 530ft par 3 with a low ceiling off the tee? Is this the DGPT? The only par 4 has risk of throwing over barbed wire into a residential back yard. It’s like the design of the course makes you want to quit halfway in. But don’t do that! Cause you’ll be halfway across the park at that point. Anywho D+
@bcraddick
No pad on 14. Paths suck
@anthonypasek
Very fun design using elevation, creeks, and tree lines. Teeboxes could be much better. Some of the rough is quite unkemp.