Kimball Pines
94 reviews (showing 1–20)
@arowe34
Cool enough course. Fairways are nice, but rough is definitely rough.
@laneben
Played shorts front 9 and longs on back. Back 9 is tight and extremely challenging. Rough is jail. Definitely need to throw straight. Still enjoyed and would only play in the fall or early spring.
@tommy8814
Needs tee signs,it gets a little confusing it was fun though, she’s a tough one!!
@bassben11
This is a sleeper top course in the area with the notion that you have to throw the disc well and smart. The rough is among the worst in the area. But the fairways are almost all very fair and cut nicely. It’s got a lot of 300+ foot holes that are hard to birdie. If you wrecklessly go for it, you are probably going to be searching for your disc in the rough. The course uses elevation well, has several cool holes you wanna throw multiple on. It lacks signage to get it to a 5. But the seemingly newish “next tee” signs get you pretty close to where you need to go. I can forgive the signage as the fairways here are everything I want in a course.
@cvollb
Super fun course! Fair and fun lines with a variety of lengths. Rough can be tough. Great course and worth playing!
@landerson
Amazing greens were just getting mowed. Away from nondiscgolfers. Great for carts.
@aurkarm
Fun track in and out of the woods. Some long tight shots and a few bombers or a variety of shots. A bit of a tale of two courses from the front 9 to back 9. Front 9 was awkward to navigate, and the short tees were just spots well worn into the dirt. Back 9 flowed pretty logically and all teed from the same concrete pads. Back 9 also had newer baskets. There are bathrooms at the start of the course. Signage was there but could be better. Overall, though, a fun course worth the time.
@mannic06
I love all the new shots added to this course. I also enjoy how peaceful this course is. Hole 18 is the hallmark of the course!
@flyer005
The lack of signage and some of the tee pads is really the reason for the rating. It’s a great looking course but without UDisc good luck finding some of the tee pads. But it really does have great potential and plenty of shot shaping.
@benstrickland
Not in great shape. The shots seem haphazardly thrown into a space and range in difficulty (from a 450 foot par 4 to a 460 foot par 3). Not an enjoyable place. Lots of other options in Battle Creek.
@atdisc
Great variety of shots on this course. The rough is rough but fairways are well maintained. All concrete tee pads for longs. Some damaged but all playable. Front nine shorts have decent dirt pads un marked. Next tee signage could be so much better with just a few more arrow signs. Must use Udisc to find your way around. Definitely worth playing (with others). Has potential for best course in BC with some more upkeep
@benmast
Fun course. Missing tee pads? We were very confused
@sdietri2
Much better than it’s 4 star rating, a few holes in the back 9 have branches in the intended lines and a few cracked tee pads
@linc454
Do not play here alone. Bring some friends for spotters. Absolute waste of my time stopping here.
@evidentlytall
Good variety of long and short holes. I love the elevation changes. Minor thing but front 9 baskets need upgraded.
@slothslair
Currently the best course in Battle Creek. I personally don't agree with the way a few holes flow but when you use the original pads that's to be expected
@chris105
The access road leading into the course is a very very bumpy dirt road. Slow down and use extra caution when coming in and out the park.
@ktknack
Loads of brush clearing over summer and fall months from the rough. Still some thick areas, but after the high season die-off losing a disc is unlikely. Lots of elevation changes and interesting shots. Some pins have been moved to alternative positions from their starting point this summer. New road entrance is in, as is a parking lot and some additional paved paths, most notabley the return from 18.