Highland Park

@mattellis

116

Nice park course. Many unused teepads causes confusion for new comers to the course.

@fausch

182

Fun holes scattered throughout a multi use city park. Mostly shorter shots - a good ace run course. Does a decent job of avoiding the non disc golf areas. Signage is awful. Lots of backtracking. A million old tee pads from previous versions add some confusion. Would be difficult to navigate without u-disc. Overall fun for a city park course, but definitely an inflated rating. Great for beginners. An ace run course for others.

@weshunt

103

Nice park mostly-putter course with a few longer shots that will favor a driver.

@slingslash

127

Could use better signage but the course is beautiful, well designed, and very maintained.

@codgercake

102

Needs better tee signs and directional signs to navigate basket to tee.

@phuznutz

104

Decent park course. There's a lot of crisscrossing that makes for a little too much spiciness for my taste

@mrmclovin420

136

Pretty good Park style course

@bigbaddawson

178

Very fun course that features a variety of fairways. The course utilizes the open space, woods, and elevation to challenge players. The main complaint is that a lack of signage makes navigating the course without UDisc very difficult. Some of the fairways overlap as well.

@elaine60

255

Nice city course, scattered trees throughout, little bit of woods. Mild elevation changes. Glad we made the stop to play.

@widgtraveler

214

Pretty unimpressed. There were a few fun holes (3,14, and 15 come to mind), but this wasn’t worth going out of the way for. I suppose after playing Kaposia and Bryant Lake the day before, almost any course might seem unimpressive.

@brianphillips

1580

This place needs tee signs and navigation.. If it's one thing I hate is walking backwards to the next tee pad.. the flow is bad throw 9 to only turn around and walk backwards past 9s tee to get to 10 why?and this isn't the only time you do that, it starts on 1 to 2.. why? Installed in 1988 and you could fix by now.

@gloper13

146

Medium distance par three course. Needs tee signs and maintenance around tee pads. Some pads are short. Worth playing but not traveling to play.

@skittskitt

111

Need some brooms.

@arothsch

99

Great beginner friendly course. A couple wooded holes early on, then upend up a bit, but by no means an "open air" course

@tboogs

141

One of my favorite courses on the east side of the twin cities metro area. Well laid-out & well kept classic city park course with a variety of shots. Nothing fancy, fun every time. A great quick 18 in Saint Paul.

@corey115

98

Tees are clear but wet. Most fairways have beaten paths

@jonnyt123

203

Fun, short and quick holes. Signage is the only thing that needs improvement.

@martti

128

Short, urban course that suffers from the positive problem of being busy at all times during the day. Best bet is to come out with a group of friends and just chill, because you won't be moving fast. It's a fun place to play, would recommend it, especially to beginners. More advanced players will be chasing after aces!

@nbuyense

126

Short hole lengths and mostly straight shot throws.

@prestidigit8tor

146

Easy, well maintained course. Most of the holes are just straight. Basically no signage and a bunch of random extra teepads makes finding the correct ones difficult. A few teepads are angled incorrectly.