13 reviews

Upkeep
4.3
Shot variety/design
3.2
Tee areas
3.9
Signage/wayfinding
3.6
Amenities
2.8
Scenery/views
3.1
jweitl97

@jweitl97

3

Fine

hulingc

@hulingc

23

Very long par 3s and short tee pads makes for a slightly frustrating round. Guess I have to get good 😆

bdlowe

@bdlowe

21

Decent for what it is, course par is generous to a fault.

haydenwilkens

@haydenwilkens

Nice baskets, would be hard to navigate without the app. Nice park, newly planted trees & well maintained park.

grtcoop

@grtcoop

Short and awkward but fun especially for beginners

johhy2disc

@johhy2disc

Great ego stroke course. A few fun lines, love the surroundings! Relaxed layout

gstevens15

@gstevens15

Course is well maintained, but the course design is very poor. You can certainly tell it was built in the 90’s with some 300 foot par 5’s. Not a very special course, not worth traveling to but if you’re close by it’s not a total waste of time.

cydisc11895

@cydisc11895

154

It's a decent enough course in a city park. Unfortunately, plays very open due to storm-related tree loss. But, should improve once the new trees have a chance to mature. New concrete tees and baskets in 2023.

pstmrtmpssm

@pstmrtmpssm

Decent course, good area, good baskets, teepads on all the shots. I'd just make everything a par 3 if you're going to play and then it's a pretty decent, if not a bit wide open, course.

averylarry

@averylarry

Good for practice - a change of scenery. You can make it more interesting/longer with choose-your-own-tee-locations.

chrisdiscs

@chrisdiscs

Little muddy, missing some tee signs. No tee pads. Easy to follow with the Udisc app

wyldthyng04

@wyldthyng04

6

Never mind the water

dougwinger

@dougwinger

No cement pads. Hard to tell where to go. #8 didn’t know where to T off from. #2 is pretty cool hole and is 3. 4 real easy. Would of gave it a 3 if knew where to tee off from or if it had t pads.