Graceland University
22 reviews (showing 1–20)
@dcastle75
Course is barely playable Hole 5 sign gone No Hole 12a tee pad basket is overgrown Whoever made this course was on something Hole 17 basket is super overgrown
@daduddell
Most tee pad signs are out of the ground. The back nine has no up keep at all with bushes growing into the baskets.
@mattwildruns
Absolute gem of a course. Huge shots required and lots of challenging lines
@joeluhlmeyer
Course needs some major help. Some fun holes on the front 9 and good pads for the most part - although some holes tee situations are poor. The back 9 is a disaster though. When the hole design isn't problematic, it's extremely boring. I'd say hole 12 could have the worst green I've seen, but hole 11 was even worse. 15 and 16 are head scratchers and then 17 features a completely unkempt and swampy green. Additionally hole 3s tee is on a bad slope and hole 5 prompts you to throw from an unmarked area on a public street. I want to give this a better score because some holes are great, but there's too many correctable issues with the course that make it frustrating to play.
@lucasrogers
Cool views around a college campus but probably only realistic to play this during college offseason. Long course with even longer walks in between and 17 seemingly has been abandoned on upkeep for no apparent reason as well.
@tuckerwoodson
Want this to be a higher score but 15 and 16 are pretty bad and 17 is totally unkept by the basket.
@boxcar
B tees are the short tees and only marked by a post. Course has the potential to be a great course with some better signage and restrooms. College campus, no playground noted.
@fooflier
The Walk of the course is a lot longer than the 7000 plus feet it claims to be. I question the par is on several holes because even though they're 300 to 400 ft the amount of obstacles on those holes would indicate adding a stroke to par. I would highly recommend flags being placed on all the baskets in such a way of where the basket can be seen in the vicinity of the tee pad.
@thedrill
Pars are a little off. Definitely need UDisc for this course.
@kellenw
This is an elite level distance course!!! Coming from someone who plays a lot of courses, this one was not fun at all. If you’re traveling on 35 I’d recommend any other course. Hole 1&2 get you really excited thinking it’s going to be a great course, but goes downhill from there. If you don’t have 450’+ consistency you will not shoot well. Very well upkeep, tpads, baskets, but not worth the stop in my opinion.
@gravelgrinder95
This course is much better than its reviews give it credit for. It is LONG so bring your big boy discs with you when you make the drive out here to tackle it. The layout isn’t as bad as advertised - the front 9 flows great, and while it gets a little more squirrelly on the back 9 it’s easy to find each tee pad and basket with the UDisc app. I would give the course 5 stars if they had better baskets & a recent mowing, but overall I would definitely recommend making the drive to play it.
@fancyson909
Poor course design. No tee pads on several holes.
@threedit
Very random layout. Like they just put a tee here and a basket there and called it a par 3. A lot of holes with blind baskets and not any real lines. It is nicely maintained grounds and a decent hole, especially between holes.
@wildisc63
Course is very confusing....layout does not flow at all ! A few nice down hill shots is about the only good thing I can say.
@smith1985
Some holes don't have pads or even a sign to throw from. Beautiful scenery, but terrible flow. Fun shots but some fairways don't have any line to the basket. Worth the hour drive to check out, but not one of my destination courses.
@seanandon
Front and back are two different courses. Pond ate my disc on 5, so, of course, I hate the front 9 now. If I were a local, I’d enjoy mastering back 9; pretty challenging. As a course to break up a road trip, wouldn’t return.
@mrwoodz0420
A little rough around the edges but overall all a fun course