52 reviews (showing 1–20)

Upkeep
2.4
Shot variety/design
3.8
Tee areas
2.6
Signage/wayfinding
2.3
Amenities
2.4
Scenery/views
3.4
lothda84

@lothda84

123

The design is great. Needs new teepads, more visible baskets, better signage, a lot of maintenance on the paths and fairways.

basswrench

@basswrench

53

The course is very technical, fairways are very tight. It is fun if you don’t mind lots of trees and searching for discs.

nickdm27

@nickdm27

1

Need to mow the 16th more often. Hard to find discs in chest high grass/ covered in ticks.

1
anniesboobs

@anniesboobs

5

Nostalgic but unkept - could use some major TLC. Thankful the app was updated bc otherwise we wouldn’t have been able to find a couple holes

ghooty

@ghooty

1

Hole 16 is par 5, trail seemed mostly clear, brush could be reduced as disc almost lost several times, solid 3 star

bhouse14

@bhouse14

2

U disk needs to be updated to match course pars and 16 was mowed so no high grass but 15 needs a little love, overall good course

nobottv

@nobottv

23

Beautiful Course, Unique Tee Shots. Overall awesome course!

jmyers360

@jmyers360

7

Leaves covering some of the more tricky paths can make slipping easy

2
charlesclusman

@charlesclusman

21

Technical but fair. Distance not an issue as accuracy is more important off the tee. Upgrades to the layout have been well executed although admittedly it took some time to accomplish. Tee signs are being worked on to reflect accurate pars, distances, and hole locations.

2
adearth18

@adearth18

11

Very challenging course to play blind. Very demanding and technical tee shots with lots of very narrow gaps. Hard to find next tee at points

jphanc

@jphanc

5

Needs to be kept up with better, pars on holes and apps don’t always match, signs show 3 tee boxes but only 1 is ever usually there

chrisgrva

@chrisgrva

Tee pads unclear. Overgrown. Pin location incorrect from tee pad and hard to find

rdahland

@rdahland

Long story short, this is a locals only course. It needs a TON of upkeep. There’s missing some baskets and after hole 8 they’re in an alternate layout which isn’t on Udisc and is often in the middle of deep rough. I gave up after hole 13 and walked the rest. 16 plays through tall grass the hole way. 15 basket is missing entirely. This place has great bones but a million trees and undefined fairways really screw it up.

discgolfcraig

@discgolfcraig

524

Most of red and blue tee markers are missing. This essentially plays as a one layout course.

josiahbardy

@josiahbardy

Decent course. Fairways aren’t very clearly defined (lots of little trees in the way). Signage is also a bit unclear. Tee pads are wood-outlined but are dirt & leaves. Not in bad shape, but I personally prefer concrete pads. Some fun shots, and a decently challenging course too. Fairly scored on UDisc. I’d play again.

bradthomas64

@bradthomas64

Needs more consistency between course par and UDisc par.

johndraxler01

@johndraxler01

23

Ugly Course with very little upkeep. Needs to be drastically improved or totally removed

tylerdickman

@tylerdickman

26

Gave this course another try since my last post. The course has been updated slightly. Proper signage and an update to UDisc would be awesome, as this course currently is very hard to navigate. But overall was a fun challenge.

wildturkey

@wildturkey

38

Heavily wooded course with lots of tight lines. Gorgeous in the fall, but probably very difficult in the spring and summer with undergrowth. Primarily dirt tee pads, and two pin locations. Low traffic, and a great place to get away for a quite and peaceful round of you can control your nerves in the tight trees.

agreenough

@agreenough

25

Same issues for years! Signs and bench’s never put in. Hole 16 has never made sense when there is room to put in the woods and not deal with tall grass and those issues.