Crooked Creek Park
127 reviews (showing 1–20)
@maxkittle
Came down from Dayton to visit and friend and played a few courses in this area. First off, Awesome course with some clear time put into it! I would have loved to give this course 5 stars but one thing just kept popping up as an issue. The layout listed on UDisc and what was actually on the course were different. Sometime even by a stroke or two. This was most evident on two holes. Hole 9 on UDisc was listed at a par 5 that was 520 feet but ended up being in a different position that made it a par 3 320ft. Hole 13 I could not see the basket off the tee. UDisc told me it was a 420ft par 4 that was straight. I piped a drive exactly where I wanted it about 360 down the fairway only to find out it the basket was to the left and I had thrown to far to go down the fairway for that position. What I thought was a long eagle look turned into a pitch up and a par. Again overall I loved this course it would just be nice if UDisc and the course matched each other on pin placements.
@kevin4discgolf
Nice course, you could tell it has been there awhile because it had so many extra teepads and pin positions, the baskets were old too but caught better then the new ones :)
@millertime11
Great course, best in the Columbia area.
@ledbottomironp
Great course
@charlesc
Love the course. first time here like the technical shots
@jreedmissippi
Fun course. A little janky in places but I’d play it again. May want to simplify the combination of layouts
@danieloddo
Nice course. Played the 18. Some “next holes” were confusing - 9/10 apparently move/switch.? Update: played again, but hole 9 still does not make sense? I must be missing something. 9 had a very unusual S-curve deep into hole length, whereas, it seemed going down walk path was more reasonable for disc flight, but didn’t seem appropriate. Then 10 had a “option” to go right back up screwy fairway from 9. This can’t be right.? Was the paved walk path to be the 9 fairway? Love the “crooked creek”. Creek was low on our play, but a high flow would put some discs at risk. Hole 7 is most risky with water - but nice landing island.
@kallsen56199
Solid course excluding the amount of times the walking path is in play. 9 and 10 were strange. Creek can eat discs if it's rained recently. Will definitely play again.
@frankiejpainter
Great course. A little confusing with two blue pads but fun and technical.
@airbudd
great course and keeps getting better. They just put more concrete teepads down. still need to finish out the pro 9 teepads and make them all concrete
@pockethand
I think the 27 hole layout is my favorite track in Columbia. Shot variety, length, fair pars, clean, etc. Not much, if anything to dislike about CCP
@kpothegamer
Very nice condition. Enough water to keep you honest but not lose your disc.
@adamwn9
It’s a nice course, but it’s still very rough around the edges. The tee pads are dirt, the rough is super thick, and the tee signs could be more informative. We also got turned around a few times between holes - the blue stakes are helpful, but it is still pretty easy to get lost. All of the being said, the holes themselves are awesome. There is a variety of shot shapes and we had fun.
@jdhastieiii
My favorite public course in the Columbia area. The primary 18 holes are wooded with water features, elevation changes and a wide range of alternating layouts keeping you on your toes and constantly changing your repertoire of throws. Multiple tee pads for varying abilities increases its appeal for all skill levels. Bonus pro-level 9 holes (27 total) are different enough to make it seem a whole new course. A must play!
@bmsg43
Not as treacherously wooded as I thought it was going to be. Well maintained.