27 reviews (showing 1–20)

Upkeep
4.4
Shot variety/design
4.3
Tee areas
4.4
Signage/wayfinding
4.3
Amenities
3.9
Scenery/views
4.1
racerpig

@racerpig

49

Would suggest hitting this course if you’re in the area.

After playing Main: Short to Short
wstawicki

@wstawicki

27

Well kept, various obstacles and terrains.

After playing Main: Short to Short
yoinksmcdoinks

@yoinksmcdoinks

117

Longs to longs have championship potential, incredibly challenging and requiring an accurate 450 to score. Better mowing and signage would make this a must play.

After playing Long to Long
oldtimer420

@oldtimer420

10

Very good but long

dowden

@dowden

47

Overall a fantastic course. Has shots you won’t find at other courses in the area. Distance is at a premium on this course. The road around the park comes into play quite a bit. Overall very well designed. The only hole I would really change is hole 10 either getting rid of the mando or clearing the secondary fairway so their is a clear line.

cujo93830

@cujo93830

369

Pretty solid course. I played the long Tees to long baskets where available. Turf pads are thin and offer little grip, bit of a bummer ok a course with multiple 400+ft par 3 holes.

2
pickupman92

@pickupman92

44

Compared to the other courses in the area, I have to give this a low rating. The first few and last few holes on the golf course are a tad boring/repetitive/unnecessarily long . Really enjoyed the wooded part, but absolutely no benches or rest spots. The layout has a lot of walking to get to the next hole so the design isn't great, playing shorts, it was still over 11k steps (per the Fitbit).

deathbat1144

@deathbat1144

8

Beautiful

cademills

@cademills

10

First time playing Coonskin and I absolutely loved it. Will be back.

After playing Main: Short to Short
3
jake24petry

@jake24petry

15

Good walking amount of walking in course. Good shot variety.

After playing Main: Short to Short
ostewart16

@ostewart16

23

No major complaints with anything, but I’ll say there were a few too many ‘tweener’ holes for my liking on the long layout. Some really nice holes, and a few that were semi-forgettable. Very well maintained though, and some work is clearly being put into making it even better.

paulbailey10

@paulbailey10

110

Very solid course! Woods, water, open shots.

After playing Long to Long
codykaso

@codykaso

6

Great variety of holes. Lots of tough mandos. Caution after rain water sits in the fields and the dirt wood areas turn into slick mud.

ryanhaddox

@ryanhaddox

33

real good course! nice shot shape options, elevation changes, wooded shots are difficult but fun. some holes still need tee pads and make sure no cars are coming on hole 7 and 13, but other than that it's great. the walk between holes isn't bad, some longer than others.

After playing Main: Short to Short
2
ericastrup

@ericastrup

42

Concrete pads would be nicer but great course overall!

After playing Main: Short to Short
kjlilly

@kjlilly

50

Beautiful long course with really nice tee pads and great mix of wooded and open shots!

karstknight

@karstknight

41

The revised layout is a great addition to the Charleston-Hurricane-Huntington metro-valley courses.

1
proprchels

@proprchels

38

This has gone from one of the worst courses in Charleston to one of the best. The course now offers a well laid out flow on both shorts and longs. Definitely helps to have a big arm if you’re throwing the longs.

After playing Long to Long
naamandunn

@naamandunn

59

My new favorite course in the area. Long, mostly flat, little brush, nice scenery, challenging shots, good signage.

After playing Main: Short to Short
ramz380

@ramz380

43

The new layout is so much better, a good mixture of shots. It’s not a championship level course by any means, but is good for any casual round. A couple true par 4’s. A bit of walking between tees, but not too much.

After playing Main: Short to Short