133 reviews (showing 1–20)

Upkeep
3.8
Shot variety/design
4.0
Tee areas
2.6
Signage/wayfinding
3.5
Amenities
3.5
Scenery/views
3.7
jademet

@jademet

82

They did what they could with the space

2
mishkin37

@mishkin37

75

Not a bad course, but the proximity of parked cars, pedestrians, and roadways makes some holes more stressful than they should be.

bubbahorton

@bubbahorton

93

Be cautious, many holes go through active park areas.

haboo5

@haboo5

83

Fun course with lots of potential, but some questionable design decisions. Shot shapes are varied but proximity to park/pedestrian areas meant we had to skip half the course when playing on a nice weekend day. Personally I'd prefer a shorter course: fairways utilizing parking areas and throwing over roads to enable 400-500ft holes just aren't worth it IMO. Still had fun, and it's a gorgeous walk. I'd probably give it a 4 if there were teepads.

texasjack

@texasjack

66

Zoo parking is on the course and half the holes are unplayable because of this.

4
borser1

@borser1

71

Apparently the course has changed because of construction at the zoo. Because of that the main course map in the app is not correct. The course as a whole is…playable. Wayfinding was difficult but there were signs throughout, I still got confused and lost at times. No tee pads and no signs at tees. Baskets are decent but some holes go through paths, roads, picnic areas, and other holes. I would think if the zoo is busy the course would be difficult to play. Some good shot variety and nice baskets throughout. But I hope that after the construction is complete they update the course and if so I think it will be very good. Most of my lower rating comes from my frustration with wayfinding holes and lack of tee pads and signs.

javespy10

@javespy10

113

Good shot variety. UDisc layouts need updated. Caution when park is busy.

1
chinqie

@chinqie

23

Construction eliminated the tees and pins of at least 2 holes in the beginning and one at the end. Multiple holes need better markers. Mind the pavilions kids pop out of everywhere.

maxstayton

@maxstayton

45

Very basic course, but still fun. Pretty impressive to fit a decent 18 hole course on that small of a property, even with shared baskets

dkelly18

@dkelly18

52

Cool course to check out if you’re in the area. Not exactly a complaint but the maintenance crews blew the leaves but left huge piles of leaves on the course for further cleanup another day.

coreydawson

@coreydawson

60

Course layout needs updating with newly shared and moved baskets. Pretty course unlike any others in the area, fun to play in sandy soil.

jdechris

@jdechris

27

No tee pads so many holes had roots or divets which made running up difficult. Overflow parking is right in the fairways of the course so multiple holes had to be skipped completely.

1
asherp

@asherp

44

Nicely designed course, but you really have to start your round before 8am if you want any hope to finish it. Started at 9:15, and by the time we made it to hole 13, they were using it as parking for the zoo. One of the more impressive "small" course I've played, from a layout perspective, even with the shared pins.

owenburnette

@owenburnette

22

Too many trees and all the same

willfraser

@willfraser

43

In dire need of tee pads. Many of the run ups have roots and big divots creating very sketchy run ups. Fun little pitch and putt course with a few farther “par 4s”

1
bigdaddy9

@bigdaddy9

49

Parking was surrounding multiple baskets when I played.

evanboyle

@evanboyle

171

Don’t come when the zoo is busy, great course otherwise

bewater

@bewater

31

Finish out the boxes and fix up tee info/directions to 14 an it’s a beautiful course.

jiminytrickitjr

@jiminytrickitjr

127

Sexton firebird over fence bit by porcupine 

mikeromo

@mikeromo

53

fun course, pretty well kept. Couldn’t play 2 holes because cars parked in the way since it’s carved into the park